9DBL0452BKILFT vs 9DBL0951BKILF

Dieser detaillierte Vergleich von 9DBL0452BKILFT und 9DBL0951BKILF bietet wertvolle Einblicke in deren Spezifikationen und Hauptmerkmale. Wir gehen ausführlich auf wichtige Faktoren ein, darunter RoHS-Konformität, REACH-Status, Serie, Montageart, Gehäusetyp und weitere relevante Eigenschaften. Die übersichtliche Darstellung der Unterschiede vereinfacht die Komponentenauswahl und erleichtert Ihnen die Wahl der optimalen Lösung für Ihre Anwendung.

Technical review by ETEI Component Engineering Source: manufacturer documentation

Replacement verdict

Compatible functional replacement candidate

The 9DBL0452BKILFT and 9DBL0951BKILF are both 3.3V zero-delay clock buffers from Renesas with compatible supply voltage, output type, and operating temperature range, making the 9DBL0951BKILF a viable functional replacement candidate for the 9DBL0452BKILFT in applications where the reduced output count is acceptable. However, the difference in output channel count and package footprint requires careful validation before substitution.

Output Type High match
Supply Voltage High match
Output Channel Count Validation required
Package Type Validation required

Parts at a glance

Part A

9DBL0452BKILFT

Renesas Electronics Corporation

Lifecycle
Active
Stock
1308 Stückzahl
Series
Clock-Timing und anwendungsspezifische Clock-Timing
Part B

9DBL0951BKILF

Renesas Electronics America Inc.

Lifecycle
Active
Stock
8029 Stückzahl
Package
VFQFN-48
Series
Takt- und anwendungsspezifisch

Key differences

Rows are prioritized by design impact. Highlighted values require attention during substitution.

Key electrical and mechanical differences between the two devices

Parameter 9DBL0452BKILFT 9DBL0951BKILF Why it matters
Manufacturer Renesas Electronics Renesas Electronics Same manufacturer ensures consistent design methodology and support ecosystem.
Function Clock Buffer / Fanout Buffer Clock Buffer / Fanout Buffer Both serve as clock distribution buffers, but output count and configuration differ.
Number of Outputs 4 9 Output count determines how many clock loads can be driven from a single device.
Input Type Differential (HCSL/LVDS) Differential (HCSL/LVDS) Input compatibility affects which clock sources can drive the buffer.
Output Type HCSL HCSL Output signaling standard must match downstream receiver requirements.
Supply Voltage 3.3 V 3.3 V Supply voltage must match the system power rail for proper operation.
Package 32-VFQFN 48-VFQFN Package footprint and pin count affect PCB layout and board space.
Operating Temperature -40°C to +85°C -40°C to +85°C Temperature range must cover the application's environmental conditions.
Maximum Output Frequency 200 MHz 200 MHz Frequency capability must meet the clock rate required by the system.

Need help validating a replacement?

Send your BOM and application constraints for technical and sourcing review.

Full specification comparison

Use manufacturer datasheets as the final authority.

Specification 9DBL0452BKILFT 9DBL0951BKILF
Supplier - Renesas Electronics America Inc
Part Status Obsolete Active
PLL Yes Yes
Main Purpose PCI Express (PCIe) PCI Express (PCIe)
Input HCSL HCSL
Output HCSL HCSL
Number of Circuits 1 1
Ratio - Input: Output 1:4 1:9
Differential - Input: Output Yes/Yes Yes/Yes
Frequency - Max 200MHz 200MHz
Voltage - Supply 3.135V ~ 3.465V 3.135V ~ 3.465V
Operating Temperature -40°C ~ 85°C -40°C ~ 85°C (TA)
Mounting Type Surface Mount Surface Mount
Base Product Number 9DBL0452 -
Digi Key Programmable Not Verified -
Packaging Tape & Reel (TR) -

Frequently asked questions

What are the 9DBL0452BKILFT and 9DBL0951BKILF?

The 9DBL0452BKILFT and 9DBL0951BKILF are Renesas (formerly IDT) zero-delay/fanout clock buffers from the 9DBL series. Both are 3.3V differential clock buffers intended for PCIe and similar high-speed clock distribution applications, supplied in a 32-pin VFQFPN package and specified over the industrial temperature range.

How do the output configurations of the 9DBL0452BKILFT and 9DBL0951BKILF differ?

The 9DBL0452BKILFT provides 4 differential outputs, while the 9DBL0951BKILF provides 9 differential outputs. The suffix digit in each part number denotes the output count, so the 9DBL0951BKILF offers more fanout capability than the 9DBL0452BKILFT.

Are the 9DBL0452BKILFT and 9DBL0951BKILF pin-compatible?

No. Although both devices use the same 32-pin VFQFPN package outline, they are not pin-compatible because the 9DBL0951BKILF routes additional differential output pairs to pins that serve different functions on the 9DBL0452BKILFT. A PCB layout designed for one device cannot be populated directly with the other without verification against the respective datasheet pin assignments.

Can the 9DBL0452BKILFT and 9DBL0951BKILF be used interchangeably in an existing design?

No. Because the output count and pin assignments differ, the two devices are not drop-in replacements. Any substitution requires reviewing the pinout, output termination, and board layout against the manufacturer datasheet for the specific device being used.

What supply voltage and output type do the 9DBL0452BKILFT and 9DBL0951BKILF use?

Both devices operate from a 3.3V nominal supply and provide differential clock outputs suitable for high-speed clock distribution. Designers should confirm the exact VDD range, output amplitude, and termination requirements in the respective Renesas datasheets before finalizing a design.

What package and temperature grade do the 9DBL0452BKILFT and 9DBL0951BKILF share?

Both parts are offered in a 32-pin VFQFPN package and are rated for the industrial temperature range, indicated by the "I" in the ordering code. The "LF" suffix denotes Pb-free/RoHS-compliant packaging, and the "T" suffix on the 9DBL0452BKILFT indicates tape-and-reel packing.

Which device should be selected for a design requiring more clock fanout?

The 9DBL0951BKILF should be selected when more differential clock outputs are required, since it provides 9 outputs versus 4 outputs on the 9DBL0452BKILFT. The choice depends on the number of downstream clock loads and the available board space, and both options should be validated against the target PCIe or clock distribution requirements.