AD7891ASZ-1 vs AD7890AR-4

Dieser detaillierte Vergleich von AD7891ASZ-1 und AD7890AR-4 bietet wertvolle Einblicke in deren Spezifikationen und Hauptmerkmale. Wir gehen ausführlich auf wichtige Faktoren ein, darunter RoHS-Konformität, REACH-Status, Serie, Montageart, Gehäusetyp und weitere relevante Eigenschaften. Die übersichtliche Darstellung der Unterschiede vereinfacht die Komponentenauswahl und erleichtert Ihnen die Wahl der optimalen Lösung für Ihre Anwendung.

Technical review by ETEI Component Engineering Source: manufacturer documentation

Replacement verdict

Not a drop-in replacement

The AD7891ASZ-1 and AD7890AR-4 are not drop-in replacements for one another. Although both are 12-bit successive-approximation ADCs from Analog Devices, they differ in input channel architecture, package footprint, and interface configuration, so a direct board-level substitution is not possible without redesign.

Different input architecture Different package footprint Different channel count Different interface configuration

Parts at a glance

Part A

AD7891ASZ-1

Analog Devices Inc.

Lifecycle
Active
Stock
5058 Stückzahl
Package
SOIC-8
Series
Datenerfassung von ADCs-DACs für besonderen Zweck
Part B

AD7890AR-4

Analog Devices Inc.

Lifecycle
Active
Stock
6793 Stückzahl
Package
SOIC-24
Series
Datenerfassung von ADCs-DACs für besonderen Zweck

Key differences

Rows are prioritized by design impact. Highlighted values require attention during substitution.

Key electrical and mechanical differences between the two devices

Parameter AD7891ASZ-1 AD7890AR-4 Why it matters
Number of ADC Channels 8 8 Channel count determines how many analog signals can be sampled; both are 8-channel devices, so channel capacity is equivalent.
Resolution 12 bit 12 bit Resolution sets the smallest detectable analog step; both are 12-bit, so measurement precision is comparable.
Sampling Rate 500 kSPS 117 kSPS Maximum throughput affects how fast signals can be captured; the AD7891 supports significantly higher sampling rates than the AD7890.
Input Type Single-ended Single-ended Input configuration determines signal wiring and common-mode handling; both use single-ended inputs, so front-end design is similar.
Supply Voltage 5 V 5 V Supply voltage must match the system rail; both operate from a 5 V supply, simplifying power design substitution.
Interface Type Parallel Serial (SPI/QSPI/MICROWIRE) The digital interface dictates how the ADC connects to the host processor; parallel vs serial interfaces are not directly interchangeable without redesign.
Package / Mounting 44-Lead MQFP (Surface Mount) 24-Lead SOIC (Surface Mount) Package footprint and pin count affect PCB layout; different packages require different board layouts and cannot be drop-in replaced.
Operating Temperature Range -40°C to +85°C -40°C to +85°C Temperature range defines environmental limits; both cover the industrial range, so thermal suitability is equivalent.
Reference Type External External Reference configuration affects accuracy and external component count; both require an external reference, so supporting circuitry is similar.

Need help validating a replacement?

Send your BOM and application constraints for technical and sourcing review.

Full specification comparison

Use manufacturer datasheets as the final authority.

Specification AD7891ASZ-1 AD7890AR-4
Supplier - Analog Devices Inc.,Rochester Electronics, LLC
Part Status Active Obsolete
Type Data Acquisition System (DAS) Data Acquisition System (DAS)
Number of Channels 8 8
Resolution(Bits) 12 b 12 b
Sampling Rate(Per Second) 500k 117k
Data Interface Serial, Parallel SPI
Voltage Supply Source Single Supply Single Supply
Voltage - Supply 5V 5V
Operating Temperature -40°C ~ 85°C -40°C ~ 85°C
Mounting Type Surface Mount Surface Mount

Frequently asked questions

What are the primary functional differences between the AD7891ASZ-1 and the AD7890AR-4?

The AD7891ASZ-1 is an 8-channel, 12-bit data acquisition system (DAS) with a parallel interface, while the AD7890AR-4 is an 8-channel, 12-bit DAS with a serial interface. Both integrate a track-and-hold amplifier, a successive approximation ADC, and a multiplexer, but they differ in their digital output interface and package options.

Are the AD7891ASZ-1 and AD7890AR-4 pin-compatible or package-compatible?

No. The AD7891ASZ-1 is supplied in a 44-lead MQFP package, whereas the AD7890AR-4 is supplied in a 24-lead SOIC package. The pin counts, pin functions, and PCB land patterns differ, so they are not drop-in replacements for one another.

What are the specified analog input voltage ranges for each device?

The AD7891ASZ-1 offers selectable input ranges of ±10 V, ±5 V, and 0 V to +5 V (with a 0 V to +10 V option depending on the model suffix). The AD7890AR-4 provides a fixed input range of ±10 V. Designers must confirm the exact range configuration against the respective datasheet for their specific grade.

How do the throughput rates of the AD7891ASZ-1 and AD7890AR-4 compare?

Both devices are 12-bit successive approximation ADCs. The AD7891ASZ-1 is specified for a throughput rate of 500 kSPS, while the AD7890AR-4 is specified for 117 kSPS. The higher throughput of the AD7891ASZ-1 makes it better suited to faster multiplexed acquisition applications.

What digital interface does each part use, and how does that affect system design?

The AD7891ASZ-1 uses a parallel microprocessor interface, which requires a parallel data bus and address lines. The AD7890AR-4 uses a serial interface compatible with SPI/QSPI/MICROWIRE, requiring fewer I/O pins. The choice affects board routing, microcontroller pin count, and firmware complexity.

Do both parts operate from the same supply voltages?

Both devices require a +5 V analog supply and a +5 V digital supply for their standard operating modes. The AD7891ASZ-1 additionally requires a ±5 V or ±10 V analog input range configuration depending on the selected model. Always verify the exact supply and reference requirements in the manufacturer datasheet for the specific grade.

Can the AD7890AR-4 be used as a direct substitute for the AD7891ASZ-1 in an existing design?

No. Because the two parts differ in package, pinout, digital interface (serial vs. parallel), throughput rate, and input range options, a direct substitution is not possible. Any replacement requires PCB redesign, firmware changes, and validation against the target system requirements.